MetaGram reviews
MetaGram: 5.6 out of 10 on 8 criteria, ranked 9 of 14, facts checked 20 October 2026. There are no user reviews from a verified Telegram account yet; the editors never write reviews themselves and never accept them from the vendor. Cloud inviting and mailing service with a no-expiry free plan, 10 of 20 checklist modules confirmed, full version from 3,490 RUB a month. Strong on paywall-free entry and shadow admin inviting. Weak: no AI commenting or warm-up, module prices hidden inside the account, docs a year without updates.
Editorial score
- Features 20 × 6
- Account stability 20 × 5
- Price per thread 15 × 7
- Entry barrier 10 × 8
- Learning materials 10 × 5
- Support 10 × 5
- Transparency 10 × 4
- Updates 5 × 3
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Features | 20 | 6 | 1.2 |
| Account stability | 20 | 5 | 1.0 |
| Price per thread | 15 | 7 | 1.1 |
| Entry barrier | 10 | 8 | 0.8 |
| Learning materials | 10 | 5 | 0.5 |
| Support | 10 | 5 | 0.5 |
| Transparency | 10 | 4 | 0.4 |
| Updates | 5 | 3 | 0.2 |
| Total | 100 | 5.6 |
Pros
- A free plan with no time limit and no card: 1,000 credits a day.
- Cloud, shadow admin inviting and an AI "neurospammer" that qualifies the person before advertising.
- The docs state Telegram limits and risks plainly (150-200 invites a day, mute checks without @SpamBot).
Cons
- No AI commenting, AI chatting, warm-up, mass story viewing or mass reactions.
- Proxies are mandatory, IPv6 unsupported; accounts are uploaded as a RAR archive up to 10 MB.
- Module prices and credit costs are visible only inside the account; the landing shows only "from" prices.
- The docs were last updated a year ago; no Telegram channel or YouTube, the only contact is the sales account.
User reviews
No reviews yet.
Reviews are published from a verified Telegram account, with a date and the period of use. The user rating is computed separately from the editorial score.
FAQ
What is MetaGram’s score?
5.6 out of 10 on 8 weighted criteria, ranked 9 of 14. Strongest points: entry barrier (8), price per thread (7); weakest: transparency (4), updates (3).
Can the MetaGram reviews on this site be trusted?
Only reviews from a Telegram account verified by signing in are published, with a date and the period of use. Reviews by vendor staff or by the editors are never published. Published now: 0.
What is criticised most in MetaGram?
No AI commenting, AI chatting, warm-up, mass story viewing or mass reactions. Proxies are mandatory, IPv6 unsupported; accounts are uploaded as a RAR archive up to 10 MB.
Where else to read about MetaGram?
Vendor site: https://metagram.space. The drawbacks on the card are backed by dated links to primary sources.
Independent rating: the vendor did not pay for the position and did not write this review. Links to the vendor site are direct, with no affiliate tags.